SCECLB293 Individual
What are your views on the general principles of the Bill and
the need for legislation to deliver the Welsh Government’s
stated policy objective (to make the Senedd a more effective
legislature by ensuring it is broadly representative of the gender
make-up of the population)?
Extreme and unnecessary. Very worrying
particularly due to the dangerous support of gender self ID in
Welsh Labour party
What are your views on the system of enforcement and potential
sanctions for non-compliance proposed in the Bill?
The right people should be in post whatever
their sex is. Biolohical sex is relevant. Gender ID is not
relevant. Gender ID is just a social construct. If it was 5%
biolohical women and 95% biological men then this might be
necessary. But the sanctions are not necessary. It cause more harm
than good.
Are there any potential barriers to the implementation of the
Bill’s provisions? If so, what are they, and are they
adequately taken into account in the Bill and the accompanying
Explanatory Memorandum and Regulatory Impact Assessment?
It is not right
Are any unintended consequences likely to arise from the
Bill?
See previous answers
What are your views on the Welsh Government’s assessment
of the financial and other impacts of the Bill?
What are your views on the balance between the information
contained on the face of the Bill and what is left to subordinate
legislation? Are the powers for Welsh Ministers to make subordinate
legislation appropriate?
Some Welsh ministers judgement seems off
Do you have any views on matters relating to the legislative
competence of the Senedd including compatibility with the European
Convention on Human Rights?
Humans should have the right to be judged on
their ability not their gender identification. If a popular male
candidate does not get in due to a less popular and less suitable
man self identifying as a woman, that is to no-ones benefit other
than the man identifying as a woman.
Do you have any views on matters related to the quality of the
legislation, or to the constitutional or other implications of the
Bill?
Are there any other issues that you would like to raise about
the Bill and the accompanying Explanatory Memorandum or any related
matters?
Anything else?
Very dangerous bill considering the support
for gender self ID. The support for gender self ID is in conflict
with the idea of women being treated with equality, and this bill
would lead to more inequality towards biological women, instead of
less